<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Liquorature: Whisky, Words, Wit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquorature.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquorature.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:53:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1Q84 by Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1274&#038;cpage=1#comment-33720</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1274#comment-33720</guid>
		<description>Nice review, Lance.  Very nicely written.  

This story was simply...magic.  Thanks for picking it, Chris.  This is the inherent beauty of what we do in Liquorature.  Whether or not this one would have ever crossed my path is debatable, but having now read it, I can&#039;t help but think it was exactly what I needed at this point.

I second Lance&#039;s appreciation for the company of Lorenzo.  Good t&#039; meetcha, mate.  And again, to Chris...kudos.  You coerced the poor fella into tolerating us for the eve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review, Lance.  Very nicely written.  </p>
<p>This story was simply&#8230;magic.  Thanks for picking it, Chris.  This is the inherent beauty of what we do in Liquorature.  Whether or not this one would have ever crossed my path is debatable, but having now read it, I can&#8217;t help but think it was exactly what I needed at this point.</p>
<p>I second Lance&#8217;s appreciation for the company of Lorenzo.  Good t&#8217; meetcha, mate.  And again, to Chris&#8230;kudos.  You coerced the poor fella into tolerating us for the eve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tintin in Tibet by chip</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1135&#038;cpage=1#comment-33435</link>
		<dc:creator>chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1135#comment-33435</guid>
		<description>Yes You are right, it is &quot;Tintin in the Congo&quot;. When I was young, I always referred to that book as Tintin in Africa because I had only seen the Dutch version which of course I could not read. The pictures looked like Africa, so that is how I always imagined it. 

And Yes, it is an Olympic year, and maybe it was because I was an immature 10 years old when I first read it, but Gluteus Maximius has always been my favourite Roman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes You are right, it is &#8220;Tintin in the Congo&#8221;. When I was young, I always referred to that book as Tintin in Africa because I had only seen the Dutch version which of course I could not read. The pictures looked like Africa, so that is how I always imagined it. </p>
<p>And Yes, it is an Olympic year, and maybe it was because I was an immature 10 years old when I first read it, but Gluteus Maximius has always been my favourite Roman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Favell&#8217;s London Dock Rum &#8211; Review by Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=941&#038;cpage=1#comment-33433</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 04:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=941#comment-33433</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very interesting indeed.  The London Dock, Navy and overproofs seem to be a bit of a mixed bag without any real consistency of quality - I like some, not others.  Still, I think I understand how the LD 40% could be damaged so badly at the end - I had a similar experience with the Favell&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very interesting indeed.  The London Dock, Navy and overproofs seem to be a bit of a mixed bag without any real consistency of quality &#8211; I like some, not others.  Still, I think I understand how the LD 40% could be damaged so badly at the end &#8211; I had a similar experience with the Favell&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1Q84 by Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1274&#038;cpage=1#comment-33428</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 03:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1274#comment-33428</guid>
		<description>I said I was disappointed in the ending, which seemed, after all the buildup, to be somewhat too brief.  But overall, I was very impressed with this book, and will be going after other works by the author.

Thanks to Lorenzo (Il Magnifico) for attending and lending real depth to the coversation.  Even if the poor dude did end up sleeping on the washing machine (don&#039;t ask) he immeasurably enriched the evening with his perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said I was disappointed in the ending, which seemed, after all the buildup, to be somewhat too brief.  But overall, I was very impressed with this book, and will be going after other works by the author.</p>
<p>Thanks to Lorenzo (Il Magnifico) for attending and lending real depth to the coversation.  Even if the poor dude did end up sleeping on the washing machine (don&#8217;t ask) he immeasurably enriched the evening with his perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mekhong Thai Rum &#8211; Review by Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?p=1426&#038;cpage=1#comment-33427</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 03:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?p=1426#comment-33427</guid>
		<description>Liquorature&#039;s May 2012 selection, chosen to keep with the Asian theme of &quot;1Q84&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liquorature&#8217;s May 2012 selection, chosen to keep with the Asian theme of &#8220;1Q84&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tintin in Tibet by Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1135&#038;cpage=1#comment-33402</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 21:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1135#comment-33402</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m delighted you found the piece. I have other favourites as well (Flight 714 is one of them, and the reason I didn&#039;t use that was because I had already reviewed Von Daniken&#039;s &quot;Chariots&quot; so I picked this in order to keep some breadth) --  one of the delights of the movie was how pieces from the canon were sneakily worked into the visuals.

Is &quot;Tintin in Africa&quot; the same as &quot;Tintin in the Congo&quot;? I think so, but am intrigued to see if you actually have a cover that says Africa or not.

As for Asterix, you have pre-empted me, since that article is half written...but I used &quot;Britain&quot; which I thought was funnier (Lord knows they all are.)  Given this is an Olympic year, perhaps I should rethink my strategy....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m delighted you found the piece. I have other favourites as well (Flight 714 is one of them, and the reason I didn&#8217;t use that was because I had already reviewed Von Daniken&#8217;s &#8220;Chariots&#8221; so I picked this in order to keep some breadth) &#8212;  one of the delights of the movie was how pieces from the canon were sneakily worked into the visuals.</p>
<p>Is &#8220;Tintin in Africa&#8221; the same as &#8220;Tintin in the Congo&#8221;? I think so, but am intrigued to see if you actually have a cover that says Africa or not.</p>
<p>As for Asterix, you have pre-empted me, since that article is half written&#8230;but I used &#8220;Britain&#8221; which I thought was funnier (Lord knows they all are.)  Given this is an Olympic year, perhaps I should rethink my strategy&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tintin in Tibet by chip</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1135&#038;cpage=1#comment-33344</link>
		<dc:creator>chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 06:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=1135#comment-33344</guid>
		<description>How did I miss this Lance. 

I have been a huge Tintin fan since my early childhood. When I was just kid (back in the 70&#039;s)  I went to Holland to stay with relatives. Unfortunately my cousins were in school and I was left to my own devices each day on the rural farm of my Uncle. Fortunately he had a collection of Tintin books. You are dead right about the detail in the drawings, as even though I could not read a word, I was able to follow each story easily just by studying the pictures. 

One of the books I read back then was &quot;Tintin in Africa&quot; which I later searched and searched for and even began to doubt existed, until my wonderful wife found me a newly published copy several years ago. It was one of the early Tintin stories and the reason it wasn&#039;t published for many years was because of the implied racism towards black Africans in the story and in the drawings. The reason I bring this up was that when I read the book 30 years after I had pieced the story together just by looking at the pictures. It was exactly as I remembered. 

I was glad that when the story was finally republished, they didn&#039;t try to mend political fences. It is necessary sometimes to look backwards just to see how far we have come. (This habit we have in our culture of hiding our mistakes in dark closets is, I think more damaging than allowing our mistakes to be visible and learning from them.)

PS: For the record, my favourite Tintin story was &quot;Flight 714&quot;, and since you have reviewed &quot;Tinitin in Tibet&quot; I would suggest that a review of &quot;Asterix at the Olympic Games&quot; is in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did I miss this Lance. </p>
<p>I have been a huge Tintin fan since my early childhood. When I was just kid (back in the 70&#8242;s)  I went to Holland to stay with relatives. Unfortunately my cousins were in school and I was left to my own devices each day on the rural farm of my Uncle. Fortunately he had a collection of Tintin books. You are dead right about the detail in the drawings, as even though I could not read a word, I was able to follow each story easily just by studying the pictures. </p>
<p>One of the books I read back then was &#8220;Tintin in Africa&#8221; which I later searched and searched for and even began to doubt existed, until my wonderful wife found me a newly published copy several years ago. It was one of the early Tintin stories and the reason it wasn&#8217;t published for many years was because of the implied racism towards black Africans in the story and in the drawings. The reason I bring this up was that when I read the book 30 years after I had pieced the story together just by looking at the pictures. It was exactly as I remembered. </p>
<p>I was glad that when the story was finally republished, they didn&#8217;t try to mend political fences. It is necessary sometimes to look backwards just to see how far we have come. (This habit we have in our culture of hiding our mistakes in dark closets is, I think more damaging than allowing our mistakes to be visible and learning from them.)</p>
<p>PS: For the record, my favourite Tintin story was &#8220;Flight 714&#8243;, and since you have reviewed &#8220;Tinitin in Tibet&#8221; I would suggest that a review of &#8220;Asterix at the Olympic Games&#8221; is in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bacardi 151 Rum &#8211; Review by Mel</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=710&#038;cpage=1#comment-32557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=710#comment-32557</guid>
		<description>I took two shots of this straight (silly me) within half an hour I was depressed, could hardly talk as I was basically in my own little world, the following day I noticed my chin was red blister like &amp; my skin started peeling off the damn drink had burnt me.
Never ever again will I touch this stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took two shots of this straight (silly me) within half an hour I was depressed, could hardly talk as I was basically in my own little world, the following day I noticed my chin was red blister like &amp; my skin started peeling off the damn drink had burnt me.<br />
Never ever again will I touch this stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Favell&#8217;s London Dock Rum &#8211; Review by chip</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=941&#038;cpage=1#comment-32438</link>
		<dc:creator>chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?page_id=941#comment-32438</guid>
		<description>We (My Rum Chums and I) did a tasting last weekend and both of the London Dock Rums (the 40 % and the Overprtoof  57.4%) were on the slate along with the Plantation Overproof and the Ragged Rock Rum. The 40 % abv. London Dock faired quite badly as a sipper with all of us at the tasting finding the rum had very little to offer, (and all of us finding that the stated ABV did not reconcile with our perceptions). The LD Overproof however was quite a different beast with much more sweetness carried forward and a much nicer overall flavour profile. (Again the stated ABV of 57.5 % had our heads shaking our heads, as these LD rums do not carry the alcohol punch we expected)  The Plantation Overproof on the other hand rocks, and the Ragged Rock was solid as well.

Here is the strange thing though; after the tasting I let everyone drink/sip/mix anything they wanted. When I checked the fill lines at the end of the evening, It was the London Dock 40 % that was half empty and the others were all just about at 3/4 to 7/8 fill. LD 40 (as I will call it) turns out to be a very decent mixer. The bitterness it carries when sipped straight disappears with just a splash of cola, and in a punch style drink it is just fine. 

I&#039;ll be getting to my reviews of the four rums in the coming weeks (or months) but, I just thought you might find my experiences to this point quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (My Rum Chums and I) did a tasting last weekend and both of the London Dock Rums (the 40 % and the Overprtoof  57.4%) were on the slate along with the Plantation Overproof and the Ragged Rock Rum. The 40 % abv. London Dock faired quite badly as a sipper with all of us at the tasting finding the rum had very little to offer, (and all of us finding that the stated ABV did not reconcile with our perceptions). The LD Overproof however was quite a different beast with much more sweetness carried forward and a much nicer overall flavour profile. (Again the stated ABV of 57.5 % had our heads shaking our heads, as these LD rums do not carry the alcohol punch we expected)  The Plantation Overproof on the other hand rocks, and the Ragged Rock was solid as well.</p>
<p>Here is the strange thing though; after the tasting I let everyone drink/sip/mix anything they wanted. When I checked the fill lines at the end of the evening, It was the London Dock 40 % that was half empty and the others were all just about at 3/4 to 7/8 fill. LD 40 (as I will call it) turns out to be a very decent mixer. The bitterness it carries when sipped straight disappears with just a splash of cola, and in a punch style drink it is just fine. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be getting to my reviews of the four rums in the coming weeks (or months) but, I just thought you might find my experiences to this point quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Karukera Rhum Vieux Millesime 1997 by Capn Jimbo's Rum Project</title>
		<link>http://www.liquorature.com/?p=1384&#038;cpage=1#comment-32321</link>
		<dc:creator>Capn Jimbo's Rum Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquorature.com/?p=1384#comment-32321</guid>
		<description>Thanks... I also revisted some old data on this, including some sourced from Robert Burr of the Rum Rennaisance. “Appelation d’Origine” is the French guarantee of geographical origin, most familiar with French wines, but here for rum.  OTOH “Appelation d’Origine Controlee&quot; (Martinique) is a guarantee of both origin and method of production.   So ends our speculation.

Personally I fascinated by this rum, as a cane juice rum produced on a French island and with French influence, but not restricted by the voluminous and what some consider inhibiting production regulations of Martinique.  That it is 12 years old is impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; I also revisted some old data on this, including some sourced from Robert Burr of the Rum Rennaisance. “Appelation d’Origine” is the French guarantee of geographical origin, most familiar with French wines, but here for rum.  OTOH “Appelation d’Origine Controlee&#8221; (Martinique) is a guarantee of both origin and method of production.   So ends our speculation.</p>
<p>Personally I fascinated by this rum, as a cane juice rum produced on a French island and with French influence, but not restricted by the voluminous and what some consider inhibiting production regulations of Martinique.  That it is 12 years old is impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

